1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. OlDogger

    OlDogger Porn Star

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2016
    Messages:
    4,987
    [O/P'S NOTE: the link to this post will be on Twitter, for those who care to respond]

    Those five represent a generational cohort, who by their patriotism and-or career ambitions, devoted themselves to the government policies that determined the course of their military service from Vietnam onward. Because they gave an oath and a devotion to that service which required not only obedience but an emotional subordination to the institutions of that service-unless THEY CHOSE to resign. They developed, incidentally, that reverence for the institution's "good decorum and order" which not only we one-term, short-timers were taught to have a reverence to those "superior officers" to the point that even in a strong disagreeing address had to be prefaced by, "With ALL DUE RESPECT TO YOUR RANK AND AUTHORITY, SIR/(now MADAME)", but as has been seen by these examples of the officer class, a reverence to the institution, itself. (Something by which draftees and no-further government service, one-termers did not generally abide).

    For whatever perspective you have on this attitude, it comes back to the saying ,
    "Hate the game; NOT the 'playas'.
    They're the product of the logic that was the foundational paradigm of being subordinate to institution mechanisms-for better or worse. I will give these five the benefit of the doubt that they served the institutional establishments of their service with sterling honor.

    I can't say the same for others who've become government service careerist after these Vietnam Era veterans.
    [Taking the words of Dutch Englund (Ernest Borgnine) in 'The Wild Bunch'; "It's NOT that you gave your word. It's WHO you gave it to!]
     
    #1